Wednesday, June 21, 2017

雜談:律師的邏輯問題

為川普辯護真不容易--他不配合,隨便發送推特信息,與自己團隊辯護說過的話相矛盾。

前天清早總統起來發了一條推特信息,似乎在抱怨自己被調查,是多麼地沒道理:I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director! Witch Hunt

媒體轟動一時,紛紛報導總統承認自己被調查了。可是還有更值得轟動的:他的律師矢口否認那條推特,堅決說總統沒有承認被調查,而且直到現在,他仍然沒有被特別調查。如果沒有被調查,總統先生的推特是在抱怨甚麼?

答曰,總統是對某些無稽之談作出反應--顯然他認為總統的反應並不正確,說自己正在被調查云云--但這位律師不願說總統不正確。哈!

當電視台記者追問,你怎麼知道總統現在仍然沒有受到特別調查?答曰,因為總統沒有收到正式的通知。特別調查團需要調查一個人的時候,有義務送給本人一份正式通知?這位很出名的律師看上去很氣憤,大聲說自己不知道特別調查顧問心裡所想的,反正他們沒有在調查川普!嗯,不知道也會那麼確定...這就是川普所能夠找到的最好律師?

我的朋友圈中沒有刑事辯護律師,不然可以問一下。我覺得很奇怪,承認正在受到調查又怎樣呢?你若實際上沒問題,總有水落石出的日子嘛...真難為他了。

Sekulow, who is chief counsel at the American Center for Law and Justice, said that if the Post's reporting were accurate, Mr. Trump "would be under investigation for taking the action that the Department of Justice asked him to take. That raises not only a serious -- not even a serious constitutional question, it's an easy constitutional question. That's impossible. The president can not be investigated, or certainly can not be found liable for engaging in an activity he clearly has power to do under the constitution."

-- 不明白他的邏輯和結論,翻譯不來--總統先生不可能受到調查?為甚麼?獨裁皇帝的邏輯...

No comments:

Post a Comment